Tom regan the case for animal rights essay

Some philosophical theories about natural environments and objects have potential to be extended to cover built environments and non-natural objects of several sorts see KingLightPalmerwhile Fox aims to include both built and natural environments in the scope of a single ethical theory.

What could be the basis of our having more inherent value than animals? Cruelty in all its guises is a bad thing, a tragic human failing.

Once we accept this view of animals - as our resources - the rest is as predictable as it is regrettable. Nonmoral natureNatural history, vol. Our duties in their case are indirect duties to other human beings, usually their parents.

Yet others are more abstract questions concerning the value and moral standing of the natural environment and its non-human components. However, others criticize the lack of certainty with which Regan's "inherent value" or "subject-of-a-life" status can be determined, and note that the sufficient conditions he lists—for example, having sense-perceptionsbeliefsdesires, motivesand memory —in effect reduce to "similarity to humans".

The worse-off principle states that, when individuals involved are not harmed in a comparable way given a certain course of action, we should mitigate the situation of those who would be worse-off.

Indeed, the richness of the language of virtues, and the emphasis on moral character, is sometimes cited as a reason for exploring a virtues-based approach to the complex and always-changing questions of sustainability and environmental care HillWensveenSandler It remains to be seen if this position escapes the charges of misanthropy and totalitarianism laid against earlier holistic and relational theories of value.

I used to think I understood this reasoning. It argues that different types of animals stand in different relationships to human political communities. The best aggregated consequences for everyone concerned are not necessarily the best for each individual. This issue was hotly contested in the years that followed.

My value as an individual is independent of my usefulness to you. Then your neighbour has done something wrong. Your neighbour no more wrongs your dog than your car would be wronged if the windshield were smashed.

If disenchantment is a source of environmental problems and destruction, then the new animism can be regarded as attempting to re-enchant, and help to save, nature. Not even all the rules commended by Common Sense qualify: The Disney proposal was to develop a major resort complex serving visitors daily to be accessed by a purpose-built highway through Sequoia National Park.

Many people who perform abortions, for example, are not cruel, sadistic people. Meanwhile, the work of Christopher Stone a professor of law at the University of Southern California had become widely discussed.

Environmental Ethics

Giving farm animals more space, more natural environments, more companions does not right the fundamental wrong, any more than giving lab animals more anaesthesia or bigger, cleaner cages would right the fundamental wrong in their case.

The progress in knowledge and material well-being may not be a bad thing in itself, where the consumption and control of nature is a necessary part of human life.

Animal rights

Among such thinkers the sort of view now favoured is one or other form of what is called contractarianism. We identified two broad categories of ethical arguments. The rights of wild thingsInquiry, vol. Not only did human beings have a direct kinship with other animals, but the latter had social, mental and moral lives too, Darwin argued.graduate the ses and dissertations and the ses how to write a dissertation introduction key cover page research paper apa loading reflective essay good manners with max good quotes for college essays online argumentative essay on financial literacy essays on making mistakes in life student teaching internship reflection essays essay on values and virtues the parts of a five paragraph essay.

Environmental ethics is the discipline in philosophy that studies the moral relationship of human beings to, and also the value and moral status of, the environment and its non-human contents. The attitudes of philosophers on our obligations to other animals and the view that other animals possess certain moral rights have shifted considerably in the last 40 years and a great deal of credit for this shift is owed to Tom Regan's The Case for Animal Rights and subsequent work.

This excellent anthology grew out of a workshop held in Regan's honor and is dedicated to him. ACT I SCENE I.

Environmental Ethics

King Lear's palace. Enter KENT, GLOUCESTER, and EDMUND KENT I thought the king had more affected the Duke of Albany than Cornwall.

Wild animal welfare: a bibliography

GLOUCESTER. This bibliography is primarily based on Oscar Horta’s Publications in English on wild animal suffering and intervention in nature (for and against), Daniel Dorado’s Ethical interventions in the wild: an annotated bibliography, and the research that Aron Vallinder and I did for a paper on wild animal welfare that we once planned to write.

If you know of relevant material not included in the. I regard myself as an advocate of animal rights — as a part of the animal rights movement. That movement, as I conceive it, is committed to a number of goals, including.

Tom regan the case for animal rights essay
Rated 5/5 based on 52 review